‘Substantial discrepancies’ exist between eGFR and measured GFR

substantial discrepancies exist between egfr and measured gfr

Sumary of ‘Substantial discrepancies’ exist between eGFR and measured GFR:

  • November 15, 2021 2 min read Source/Disclosures Published by: Source: Zhu X, et al.
  • Back to Healio Discrepancies between eGFR and measured GFR suggest that measured GFR may be the superior calculator for diagnosing kidney disease, according to a speaker at ASN Kidney Week.
  • ” Researchers evaluated eGFR from serum creatinine alone (eGFRCR) and cystatin and creatinine (eGFRCYS-CR) using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations without race coefficients from four U.S. community-based cohorts.
  • ” “Clinical implications of our study include eGFR is useful but not always a replacement for mGFR,” Zhu said.
  • “Research implications include investigating new GFR measurement techniques which are less cumbersome and have lower variability is essential, and cost-effectiveness studies are needed to examine during which instances mGFR are needed.
  • ” Limitations of the study include single measurements of mGFR and serum markers, as well as combined data from cohorts that used different methods of GFR measurement, according to the researchers.
  • ” References: Study compares different assessments of kidney function.

Want to know more click here go to source.

From -


Site Language

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.